Utilitarianism: Greatst Impediment to Justice

Authors

  • S. Nengneithem Haokip Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v5i3.841

Keywords:

Categorical Imperative, End and Means, Just-War Theory (JWT), Law of Nature, Relative Law

Abstract

This paper evaluates the validity of the foundational ethical conception of Justice and its contesting contradictory conception, Utilitarianism in framing the institutional structure of a nation. Thereby the paper asserts the importance of Justice and certain virtues to a nation’s rise and fall and observes greatest impediment of Justice in the idea of Utilitarianism. While Utilitarianism advances its own conception of Justice, based on critical-theoretical approach the article advances three-fold arguments in order to reprove Utilitarianism of its claim. Utilitarianism is not a viable form of Justice since the theory represents a form of egoism, is structurally inconsistent to sound ethical doctrine, and because it has dissolved the end and means dichotomy.

Additional Files

Published

2022-09-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Utilitarianism: Greatst Impediment to Justice. (2022). Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 5(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v5i3.841

Similar Articles

1-10 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)