Main Article Content
Abstract
Aviation regulators increasingly rely on competency-based training and high-fidelity simulation to manage operational risk, yet cross-border recognition of training technologies remains uneven. This paper asks how aviation training patents can act as socio-technical reference architectures that support regulatory convergence in simulator qualification, data governance, and continuous oversight. We adopt a desk-based comparative policy analysis combined with case-oriented document review of three patented training architectures: a cyber-physical flight simulator that transforms real flight telemetry into adaptive scenarios, a virtual-reality pilot training system, and an AI-avatar-enabled universal simulator. Findings show that patents influence standards not only via legal protection but via explicit modularization, audit-ready data interfaces, and traceable performance metrics that can be mapped to ICAO/EASA/FAA qualification criteria. Building on this mapping, we operationalize the notion of continuous certification by specifying auditable artifacts (scenario provenance, model versioning, instructor interventions, and qualification test guides) and propose a lifecycle in which certification is maintained through evidence streams rather than episodic re-qualification. The paper contributes a practical evaluation framework for regulators and training organizations and clarifies limitations and governance risks, including data protection constraints and confirmation bias in single-inventor narratives.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.