Utilitarianism: Greatst Impediment to Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v5i3.841Keywords:
Categorical Imperative, End and Means, Just-War Theory (JWT), Law of Nature, Relative LawAbstract
This paper evaluates the validity of the foundational ethical conception of Justice and its contesting contradictory conception, Utilitarianism in framing the institutional structure of a nation. Thereby the paper asserts the importance of Justice and certain virtues to a nation’s rise and fall and observes greatest impediment of Justice in the idea of Utilitarianism. While Utilitarianism advances its own conception of Justice, based on critical-theoretical approach the article advances three-fold arguments in order to reprove Utilitarianism of its claim. Utilitarianism is not a viable form of Justice since the theory represents a form of egoism, is structurally inconsistent to sound ethical doctrine, and because it has dissolved the end and means dichotomy.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 S. Nengneithem Haokip

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.